Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Model Lead Based Paint Risk Assessor Practice Test

What distinguishes a risk assessment from an EBL child investigation?

1. Risk assessments are more expensive

2. Risk assessments focus on lead hazards, while EBL investigates exposure sources

3. EBL investigations are quicker

4. Both determine the same factors

The correct answer is: Risk assessments focus on lead hazards, while EBL investigates exposure sources

A risk assessment and an Elevated Blood Lead (EBL) investigation address different objectives within the context of lead exposure. The correct answer highlights that risk assessments are specifically designed to identify and evaluate lead hazards present in an environment, such as lead-based paint or contaminated soil. This assessment plays a critical role in understanding the potential risks to inhabitants based on the presence of these hazards. In contrast, an EBL investigation focuses primarily on identifying sources of exposure for individuals who have already tested positive for elevated blood lead levels. This process aims to trace back to possible environmental or occupational sources that may have contributed to the elevated levels observed in the child. Understanding this distinction is vital because it delineates the proactive nature of the risk assessment—seeking to prevent lead exposure before it occurs—compared to the reactive nature of an EBL investigation which is centered on addressing existing exposure in a child. This differentiation assists in formulating appropriate public health responses and remediation strategies.